What do you believe in?
Supernatural Chance or a Supernatural Creator?
“my people are destroyed from lack of knowledge.” Hosea 4:6


 |
|
 |
| |
“A mathematical analysis of the experiments showed that
the proteins themselves acted to correct any imbalance imposed on them through artificial mutations and restored the chain to working order …
The authors sought to identify the underlying cause for this self-correcting behavior in the observed protein chains. Standard
evolutionary theory offered no clue.”
Princeton University, “Evolution's new wrinkle: Proteins with cruise control provide new perspective,” November 10th, 2008, Physorg.com
http://www.physorg.com/news145549897.html
“The implication, the researchers said, is that birds almost certainly did not descend from theropod dinosaurs, such as tyrannosaurus or allosaurus. The findings add to a growing body of evidence in the past two decades that challenge some of the most widely-held beliefs about animal evolution.
"For one thing, birds are found earlier in the fossil record than the dinosaurs they are supposed to have descended from," Ruben said.
"That's a pretty serious problem, and there are other inconsistencies
with the bird-from-dinosaur theories …
“A velociraptor did not just sprout feathers at some point and fly
off into the sunset," Ruben said.”
Oregon State University, “Discovery raises new doubts about dinosaur-bird links,” June 9th, 2009, Physorg.com.
http://www.physorg.com/news163760732.html
“In each of these pivotal nexuses in life's history, the principal “types" seem to appear rapidly and fully equipped with the signature features of the respective new level of biological organization. No intermediate “grades" or intermediate forms between different types are detectable.”
—Eugene V Koonin,
“The Biological Big Bang model for the major transitions in evolution,” National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, in Biology Direct 2007, 2:21.
http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/21
"To take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage
is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that
carries the same validity as a bedtime story - amusing, perhaps
even instructive, but not scientific."
—Henry Gee
Ardent Evolutionist, Dr. Henry Gee, Senior Editor, Biological Sciences for the journal Nature as written in his book,In Search of Deep Time: Beyond the Fossil Record to a New History of Life, New York, The Free Press, 1999, page 126-127.
"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some
of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant
promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific
community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism … Moreover, that materialism
is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door."
—Richard Lewontin
Evolutionary geneticist, Alexander Agassiz Research Professor, Harvard University, “Billions and billions of Demons,” The New York Review, p. 31, January 9, 1997
|
|
 |
|
 |
|



 |
|
 |
| |
“We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some
of its constructs, in spite
of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have
a prior commitment,
a commitment to materialism …
Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine
Foot in the door."
—Richard Lewontin
Evolutionary geneticist, Alexander Agassiz Research Professor, Harvard University, “Billions and billions of Demons, “The New York Review, page 31, January 9, 1997.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|