A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism
Do all scientists really believe in Darwinism? No, but to admit to any skepticism can often lead to ridicule, lack of tenure, and even dismissal.
However, some scientists have boldly come forward to sign
“A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism”
"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."
 |
|
 |
| |
"I found it important to sign this statement because I believe intellectual freedom fuels scientific discovery. If we, as scientists are not allowed to question, ponder, explore, and critically evaluate all areas of science but forced to comply with current scientific orthodoxy then we are operating in a mode completely antithetical to the very nature of science."
–Dr. Rebecca Keller
Ph.D. Biophysical Chemistry, CEO of Gravitas Publications, which publishes the “Real Science for Kids” textbook series, providing textbooks that teach kids objective science in the core disciplines of science.
"I signed the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism statement, because I am absolutely convinced of the lack of true scientific evidence in favour of Darwinian dogma. Nobody in the biological sciences, medicine included,
needs Darwinism at all. Darwinism is certainly needed, however, in order
to pose as a philosopher, since it is primarily a worldview. And an awful one,
as George Bernard Shaw used to say."
–Dr. Raul Leguizamon
M. D., Pathologist, professor of medicine at the Autonomous University of Guadalajara, Mexico
|
|
 |
|
 |
|