Press Release/MediaAbout Us/Contact InfoDo you think you're a good person? Do you know Him?

> Home

> Origin of the Universe (Cosmology)
Science or Pseudo-Science?

> Origin of Life (Abiogenesis)
Science or Pseudo-Science?

> Common Descent (Darwinism)
Science or Pseudo-Science?

> How Does Evolution
Supposedly Work?

> Genetics

> Mutations

> Genetic Recombination

> Gene Duplication

> Natural Selection

> Fossil Evidence

> Stasis

> “Junk” DNA – The Biggest Blunder of Evolutionary-Based Science

> Endogenous Retroviruses

 
 

"Darwinism is a trivial idea that has been elevated to the status of the scientific theory that governs modern biology."
–Dr. Michael Egnor

Professor of Neurosurgery and Pediatrics at State University of New York, Stony Brook

 
 

 

 

A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism

Do all scientists really believe in Darwinism? No, but to admit to any skepticism can often lead to ridicule, lack of tenure, and even dismissal.

However, some scientists have boldly come forward to sign
“A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism”

"We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."

Go to http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/ or download the PDF for the list.

 
 

"I found it important to sign this statement because I believe intellectual freedom fuels scientific discovery. If we, as scientists are not allowed to question, ponder, explore, and critically evaluate all areas of science but forced to comply with current scientific orthodoxy then we are operating in a mode completely antithetical to the very nature of science."
–Dr. Rebecca Keller

Ph.D. Biophysical Chemistry, CEO of Gravitas Publications, which publishes the “Real Science for Kids” textbook series, providing textbooks that teach kids objective science in the core disciplines of science.

"I signed the Scientific Dissent From Darwinism statement, because I am absolutely convinced of the lack of true scientific evidence in favour of Darwinian dogma. Nobody in the biological sciences, medicine included,
needs Darwinism at all. Darwinism is certainly needed, however, in order
to pose as a philosopher, since it is primarily a worldview. And an awful one,
as George Bernard Shaw used to say."
–Dr. Raul Leguizamon

M. D., Pathologist, professor of medicine at the Autonomous University of Guadalajara, Mexico

 
 

Join Our Email List
Email:  

 

 
 

"The ideology and philosophy of neo-Darwinism which is sold by its adepts as a scientific theoretical foundation of biology seriously hampers the development of science and hides from students the field’s real problems."
–Dr. Vladimir Voeikov

Professor of Bio-organic Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences.

 
 

 

 

 

© 2009, Who Is Your Creator, All Rights Reserved

website statistics